Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"
Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

January 23, 2012 01:48AM
My friend Rabbi Yaakov Blau, in his familiar iconoclastic fashion, lays out the case against thought questions as opposed to spit back on tests. While he makes some good points, I believe that there are two fundamental flaws in his argument:

1) He creates a straw man by claiming to argue against those who hold that spit back questions are awful education and we should only be giving thought questions to our students. I do not know too many educators who actually take such a position. My sense is that many educators value the more thoughtful and thought-provoking questions, yet realize that there is a certain degree of spit back necessary in order to ensure that students know the basics. And, of course, even spit back questions can be phrased in ways that force the students to think a bit and not simply spit back (without being the lengthy essays that Rabbi Blau posits should be done at home).

2) Rabbi Blau seems to feel that thought questions are too time-consuming (and perhaps deserve that amount of time) to be done in the context of a one period test. That position leads him to say that such questions should therefore not be done in class. However, why does Rabbi Blau not consider that perhaps conventional tests are not the best method of assessment for such classes? There is no shortage of ways in which to assess student understanding of material, and if standard tests do not allow a teacher to assess in the best way possible, then perhaps tests should be replaced by some other form of assessment. Rabbi Blau does allude to this by saying that thought questions should be homeworks - but why stop at homework? Perhaps give a short answer test accompanied by a more thoughtful and lengthy take-home assignment?

Rabbi Blau acknowledges this point in his discussion of rubrics. However, he seems to discount rubrics by writing "However, I don’t think it’s so fair to have a thought question where the students need to “guess” what your rubrics are." - No problem. If you use an alternative form of assessment, you have to make sure to tell the students the rubric in advance. I am not sure why Rabbi Blau discounts a widely-used method of grading simply because there are those people who do not know how to use them.

Bivracha,
Aaron Ross
Subject Author Posted

Thought questions vs "spit back"

Yaakov Blau January 18, 2012 09:53AM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Aaron Ross January 23, 2012 01:48AM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Shalom Carmy January 23, 2012 02:09PM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Tova W. Sinensky January 24, 2012 10:41AM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Tzvi Pittinsky January 24, 2012 10:43AM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Yaakov Blau January 24, 2012 08:27PM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

tzvi klugerman January 26, 2012 12:44AM

Re: Thought questions vs "spit back"

Elly Lasson February 05, 2012 09:50AM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Message:
This is a moderated forum. Your message will remain hidden until it has been approved by a moderator or administrator